31. Jan, 2014


Issue: Has the world been lied to about the scientific reasoning behind the collapse of the Twin towers and WTC7

I believe any cynical view or claim on this issue should be followed up with a very detailed reasoning as to why somebody may come to such a conclusion and explain why additional attention is absolutely necessary when contemplating these events.  As my knowledge is based on “Agreement reality” (accepting somebody else’s word based on my own observation of their information) I have reviewed both sides vigorously.  This post does not have anything to do with the politics behind “why”, but just highlights some discrepancies in the science of the original story and what we can observe personally. 

The main perspectives that are conflicting are the authorities which includes the 9/11 commission report (http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/ ) and (NIST) National Institute of Standards and Technology (http://www.nist.gov/ ) with the most (accredited and prestigious) opposition coming from the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth movement ( http://www.ae911truth.org/ ) founded by Richard Gage, architect of 25 years, and member of the American Institute of Architects, and there is also a variety of other independent journalists that have covered it, which are unfortunately followed by a slew of counter perspectives labeling the people who have critically questioned these events as “conspiracy theorists” or "fear mongers".  

There is a lot of “Debunking sites” that do regurgitate the original NIST assessment such as(http://www.debunking911.com/) and (http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842) but with a more slanderous appeal to the 9/11 truth movement. But what is noticeable to everyone regardless is a conflict in the perceived science and physics amongst many accredited professionals. 

The 9/11 commission report has often been referred to as a  “political document” as there’s really not much emphasis on science included and basically entails a story of why and how all the events transpired and surprisingly provides no information in regards to WTC7 the third building to fall on 9/11. But NIST did pick that one up and according to NIST  “The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building. According to the report's probable collapse sequence, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.”

After taking that in and digesting what the NIST asserts to be true take the time to review other videos and counter perspectives and see if you can still accept this answer.

Examples of burning buildings and other demolition

WTC Building 7 Collapse - 23 angles  This is WTC7 collapse compiled from 23 different angles (as the title entails) and we’ll notice the exact same type of collapse.

Skyscraper burns like a torch and NO 9/11 collapse (( Gasp )) Example of a skyscraper in china being engulfed in its entirely due to office fires and structure of the steel never falters.

Dubai Skyscraper Burns, Doesn't Collapse at free Fall Speed  As the title states “Dubai Skyscraper Burns, Doesn't Collapse”

Houston High-rise Fire 8/30/10  As the title states “Houston High-rise Fire 8/30/10”

Demolition of Skyscraper  Completely unrelated example of a known skyscraper demolition.

Precompiled and Pro New Investigation videos from other sources

A\E911 – Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org  Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 Publicity video. 

AE911Truth Experts Speak Out

Journalist Ben Swann - Ben Swann Truth in Media: More Americans "Rethinking" 9/11?  Ben Swann Truth in Media: More Americans "Rethinking" 9/11? (Includes NIST perspective by head investigator as well)

 The Official ReThink911 Video   Rethink911.orgs awareness video (Includes some excerpts from other videos)

Russia Today New 9/11 photos 'prove WTC exploded from inside'   “New 9/11 photos 'prove WTC exploded from inside”

Civilian footage and other videos

Firemen Explosion Testimony   Firemen Explosion Testimony – States numerous explosions took place
What's 9/11? Afghans never heard of NYC terror  What's 9/11? Afghans never heard of NYC terror

9/11 Experiments: Eliminate the Impossible


My views on this subject is that there is information being witheld from the public and my appeal rest in the opinons of the independent speculation provided by accredited individuals from around the world.  From everything I have provided here in this post I do not think there is anyway If you thoroughly investigate the information provided you can get up from your computer with a different perspective. 
Šimon Růžička's profile photoJake Heuft's profile photoDwayne Knight's profile photoAllen Booth's profile photo